4.8 Article

In vivo evaluation of acid-induced changes in oesophageal mucosa integrity and sensitivity in non-erosive reflux disease

Journal

GUT
Volume 62, Issue 9, Pages 1256-1261

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302645

Keywords

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; oesophageal mucosa; oesophageal impedance; oesophageal reflux; oesophageal physiology; endoscopic ultrasonography; acid-related diseases; adenocarcinoma; anti-reflux therapy; Barrett's oesophagus; gastrointestinal motility; dysphagia; erosive oesophagitis; mucosal barrier; neurogastroenterology

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council for Translational Research in Neurogastroenterology [MGAB1A7R]
  2. Sandhill Scientific, USA
  3. MRC [G0802313] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0802313] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) have impaired oesophageal mucosal integrity (dilated intercellular spaces). Oesophageal mucosal integrity reflects the balance between repeated reflux damage and mucosal recovery. The relationship between mucosal integrity and acid sensitivity is unclear. Oesophageal impedance may be used for in vivo mucosal integrity measurement. We studied acid-induced changes in oesophageal mucosal integrity and acid perception in patients with heartburn. Design 50 patients with heartburn whithout oesophagitis underwent impedance monitoring before, during and after 10 min oesophageal perfusion with neutral (pH6.5) and acid solutions (pH1). Symptoms and impedance were recorded during perfusion. Impedance recovery was assessed for 2 h post-perfusion in ambulatory conditions followed by 24-h impedance-pH study. Results Reflux monitoring discriminated 20 NERD and 30 functional heartburn (FH) patients. Neutral perfusion caused impedance fall that recovered within 10 min. Acid perfusion caused impedance fall with slow recovery: 6.5 /min (IQR 3.3-12.0 /min). Patients with slow recovery (<25th percentile) had lower baseline impedance (1273 +/- 208 vs. 3220 +/- 275 +/-, p < 0.01) and more frequent acid sensitivity (10/12 vs. 4/12, p = 0.04) than those with fast (>75th percentile) recovery. Patients with NERD had lower baseline impedance (1669 +/- 182 vs. 2384 +/- 211 , p = 0.02) and slower impedance recovery (6.0 +/- 0.9 /min vs. 10.7 +/- 1.6 /min, p = 0.03) than patients with FH. Conclusion Impaired mucosal integrity might be the consequence of repeated reflux episodes with slow recovery. Mucosal integrity, recovery capacity and symptom perception are linked. Low basal impedance and slow recovery after acid challenge are associated with increased acid sensitivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available