4.7 Article

Alcohol consumption is inversely associated with the risk of developing chronic kidney disease

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages 1009-1016

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2014.414

Keywords

chronic kidney disease; microalbuminuria; nutrition

Funding

  1. Dutch Kidney Foundation
  2. Top Institute (TI) Food and Nutrition, The Netherlands [CH 001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are few reports of associations between alcohol consumption and risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD). To investigate this further, we studied 5476 participants aged 28-75 years in the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-Stage Disease (PREVEND) study, a prospective population-based cohort, who were free of CKD at baseline (1997/1998). Alcohol consumption was self-reported on a questionnaire validated against serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The primary outcome was de novo CKD defined as a combination of a creatinine-cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) under 60ml/min per 1.73 m(2) and/or the mean of two consecutive 24-h urinary albumin excretions over 30mg. During four serial follow-up examinations (median 10.2 years until February 2012), 903 participants developed CKD. Compared with those abstaining from alcohol, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for CKD risk were 0.85 (0.69-1.04) for occasional (under 10 g/week), 0.82 (0.69-0.98) for light (10-69.9 g/week), 0.71 (0.58-0.88) for moderate (70-210 g/week), and 0.60 (0.42-0.86) for heavier (over 210 g/week) alcohol consumers (significant trend). Similar inverse associations for alcohol consumption were found when CKD was defined as eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73m(2) or as 24-h urinary albumin excretion over 30mg. Thus, in this population-based cohort, alcohol consumption was inversely associated with the risk of developing CKD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available