4.3 Article

Tracing coalbed natural gas-coproduced water using stable isotopes of carbon

Journal

GROUND WATER
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 329-334

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00417.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recovery of hydrocarbons commonly is associated with coproduction of water. This water may be put to beneficial use or may be reinjected into subsurface aquifers. In either case, it would be helpful to establish a fingerprint for that coproduced water so that it may be tracked following discharge on the surface or reintroduction to geologic reservoirs. This study explores the potential of using delta C-13 of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) of coalbed natural gas (CBNG) - coproduced water as a fingerprint of its origin and to trace its fate once it is disposed on the surface. Our initial results for water samples coproduced with CBNG from the Powder River Basin show that this water has strongly positive delta C-13(DIC) (12 parts per thousand to 22 parts per thousand) that is readily distinguished from the negative delta C-13 of most surface and ground water ( - 8 parts per thousand to - 11 parts per thousand). Furthermore, the DIC concentrations in coproduced water samples are also high (more than 100 mg C/L) compared to the 20 to 50 mg C/L in ambient surface and ground water of the region. The distinctively high delta C-13 and DIC concentrations allow us to identify surface and ground water that have incorporated CBNG-coproduced water. Accordingly, we suggest that the delta C-13(DIC) and DIC concentrations of water can be used for long-term monitoring of infiltration of CBNG-coproduced water into ground water and streams. Our results also show that the delta C-13(DIC) of CBNG-coproduced water from two different coal zones are distinct leading to the possibility of using delta C-13(DIC) to distinguish water produced from different coal zones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available