4.8 Article

Efficient and productive asymmetric Michael addition: development of a highly enantioselective quinidine-based organocatalyst for homogeneous recycling via nanofiltration

Journal

GREEN CHEMISTRY
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 663-674

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2gc36407g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Commission's Marie Curie Initiative [PITN-GA-2008-214226-Nemopur]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relatively high cost and low availability of chiral organocatalysts, in addition to the high catalytic loading required (typically 1-30 mol%), pose a general challenge to the industrial development of economical asymmetric organocatalytic processes. This challenge can be addressed by recycling the organocatalysts. In this work, the potential of a class of organocatalysts, based on the cinchona alkaloid quinidine, was evaluated for the enantioselective synthesis step of an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Enlarging the organocatalysts through polyalkylation made the organocatalysts easier to recycle with organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) membranes. Each organocatalyst candidate's molecular size, molecular charge and ability to form hydrogen bonds were all important factors which determined the membrane retention of the catalyst. The consideration of these three factors enabled the eventual identification of a catalyst, of MW = 1044 Da, that was almost completely retained by the membrane, making it well-suited for recycling via OSN. In addition, a marked improvement in catalytic performance was observed for the enlarged catalyst compared to the non-enlarged catalyst, with high enantio-selectivities of >92% ee obtained for all catalysed asymmetric Michael additions. Finally, a 2-stage membrane process was implemented to improve the productivity of the catalyst recycling process, resulting in a 96% reduction of solvent required for the recycling process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available