4.1 Article

Effect of different irrigation regimes on the quality attributes of monovarietal virgin olive oil from cv. Cobrancosa

Journal

GRASAS Y ACEITES
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 41-49

Publisher

CONSEJO SUPERIOR INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS-CSIC
DOI: 10.3989/gya.070512

Keywords

cv. Cobrancosa; Irrigation; Quality indices; Virgin olive oil

Funding

  1. AGRO-INIA program of Ministerio da Agricultura (Portugal) [AGRO 175]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia do Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e do Ensino Superior (Portugal) [SFRH/BD/18441/2004]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/18441/2004] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Effect of different irrigation regimes on the quality attributes of monovarietal virgin olive oil of cv. Cobrancosa The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different irrigation strategies in virgin olive oil (VOO) composition and quality of cv. Cobrancosa, integrated in a protected denomination of origin of Azeite de Tras-os-Montes in the Northeast of Portugal. Three irrigation treatments were applied: T2-full irrigation that received a seasonal water equivalent to 100% of estimated crop evapotranspiration (ETc), T1-continuous deficit irrigation (30% ETc) and T0-rainfed treatment. Data were collected from two consecutive crop years (2005-2006). Irrigation regimes had a minor effect on standard quality indices (free fatty acids, peroxide value, K-232 and K-270) of VOO and in fatty acid composition. Total polyphenols decreased up to treatment T2, and were strongly related to the water stress integral, suggesting that the effect of irrigation on this variable occurs along the crop season and not just during the oil accumulation phase. A strategy of continuous deficit irrigation with only 30% of maximum ETc may have an advantageous effect, as it increased oil yield to more than double that of rainfed conditions while VOO quality was similar.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available