4.2 Article

Strength of non-spherical particles with anisotropic geometries under triaxial and shearing loading configurations

Journal

GRANULAR MATTER
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 531-542

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-013-0428-6

Keywords

Complex shaped grains; Failure criteria; Discrete element method

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0985662]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP0985662] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a study on the macroscopic shear strength characteristics of granular assemblies with three- dimensional complex-shaped particles. Different assemblies are considered, with both isotropic and anisotropic particle geometries. The study is conducted using the discrete element method (DEM), with so-called sphero-polyhedral particles, and simulations of mechanical true triaxial tests for a range of Lode angles and confining pressures. The observed mathematical failure envelopes are investigated in the Haigh-Westergaard stress space, as well as on the deviatoric-mean pressure plane. It is verified that the DEM with non-spherical particles produces results that are qualitatively similar to experimental data and previous numerical results obtained with spherical elements. The simulations reproduce quite well the shear strength of assemblies of granular media, such as higher strength during compression than during extension. In contrast, by introducing anisotropy at the particle level, the shear strength parameters are greatly affected, and an isotropic failure criterion is no longer valid. It is observed that the strength of the anisotropic assembly depends on the direction of loading, as observed for real soils. Finally simulations on a virtual shearing test show how the velocity profile within the shear band is also affected by the grain's shape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available