4.7 Article

Converse Bergmann cline in a Eucalyptus herbivore, Paropsis atomaria Olivier (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae):: phenotypic plasticity or local adaptation?

Journal

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 424-431

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00374.x

Keywords

Australia; body size; converse Bergmann's rule; leaf beetle; latitude; Paropsis atomaria; season length; temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To measure latitude-related body size variation in field-collected Paropsis atomaria Olivier (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) individuals and to conduct common-garden experiments to determine whether such variation is due to phenotypic plasticity or local adaptation. Location Four collection sites from the east coast of Australia were selected for our present field collections: Canberra (latitude 35 degrees 19' S), Bangalow (latitude 28 degrees 43' S), Beerburrum (latitude 26 degrees 58' S) and Lowmead (latitude 24 degrees 29' S). Museum specimens collected over the past 100 years and covering the same geographical area as the present field collections came from one state, one national and one private collection. Methods Body size (pronotum width) was measured for 118 field-collected beetles and 302 specimens from collections. We then reared larvae from the latitudinal extremes (Canberra and Lowmead) to determine whether the size cline was the result of phenotypic plasticity or evolved differences (= local adaptation) between sites. Results Beetles decreased in size with increasing latitude, representing a converse Bergmann cline. A decrease in developmental temperature produced larger adults for both Lowmead (low latitude) and Canberra (high latitude) individuals, and those from Lowmead were larger than those from Canberra when reared under identical conditions. Main conclusions The converse Bergmann cline in P. atomaria is likely to be the result of local adaptation to season length.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available