4.8 Article

Carbon preservation in humic lakes; a hierarchical regulatory pathway

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 775-784

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12066

Keywords

climate change; decomposition; enzymes; eutrophication; freshwater sediment; greenhouse gas; inhibitors; peatland; pH

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council
  2. Royal Society
  3. Leverhulme Trust
  4. EU-FP7-ERA-ENV-HEALTH
  5. Bioscience Environment and Agricultural Alliance (Wales, UK)
  6. NERC [NE/G00286X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G00286X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peatland catchments store vast amounts of carbon. Humic lakes and pools are the primary receptacles for terrigenous carbon in these meta-ecosystems, representing sequestration hotspots; boreal lakes alone store ca. 120 similar to Pg C. But little is known about the mechanisms that preserve aquatic carbon stocks. Here, we determined the regulatory pathway of decomposition in relation to traditional limitations, namely anoxia, decay inhibiting compounds, low nutrients and acidity, using in vitro manipulation, mesocosms and natural gradients. We show that anoxia represents a powerful hierarchical preservation mechanism affecting all major limitations on decomposition and recapturing carbon that would otherwise escape from peatlands. Oxygen constraints on microbial synthesis of oxidases and nutrient-cycling enzymes, prevents the decay of organic matter to CO2, CH4 and N2O by allowing inhibitor accumulation and lowering nutrients. However, this pathway is sensitive to direct nutrient inputs and therefore eutrophication could initiate catastrophic feedback to global warming via dramatically increased greenhouse gas emissions. Identifying these process-specific limitations should inform better management and conservation of these vital systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available