4.5 Article

Population structure of edible dormouse in Poland: the role of habitat fragmentation and implications for conservation

Journal

JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
Volume 298, Issue 3, Pages 217-224

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12304

Keywords

Glis glis; microsatellites; cytochrome b; phylogeography; effective population size; edible dormouse; habitat fragmentation; genetic diversity

Categories

Funding

  1. FNR (Fonds National de la Recherche) [PHD-08-002]
  2. Adam Mickiewicz University [PBWB 202/00]
  3. Infrastructure and Environment Operational Programme
  4. National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management [POIS.05.01.00-00-202/09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of habitat fragmentation and the resulting decreases in effective population sizes are not easy to document because they take place over many generations and may be affected by factors other than demographic ones. Here, we used 22 microsatellite loci to investigate genetic structure and diversity in populations of edible dormice Glis glis from habitats that varied widely in area and in the degree of connectivity to other populations. We found that populations from the most fragmented north-western region of Poland were characterized by extremely limited gene flow and low genetic diversity compared to less fragmented populations from southern Poland. STRUCTURE analysis revealed three genetic groups in Poland, which might reflect adaptation to environmental conditions across south-north and east-west gradients, but could also be due to historical patterns of post-glacial colonization. The latter hypothesis is suggested by the observation that southern populations from Poland grouped with those from the Balkans based on microsatellite data; however, the fact that all Polish populations shared western mtDNA cytochrome b haplotypes is inconsistent with this scenario. We discuss the consequences of our findings for the conservation of the edible dormouse in Poland.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available