4.1 Article

Factors associated with the oral health-related quality of life in elderly persons in dental clinic: validation of a Mandarin Chinese version of GOHAI

Journal

GERODONTOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 184-191

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00360.x

Keywords

gerodontology; oral health; quality of life

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Factors associated with the oral health-related quality of life in elderly persons in dental clinic: validation of a Mandarin Chinese version of GOHAI Objectives: To translate the original English version of Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) into Mandarin Chinese and assess its reliability and validity for use among the elderly in inland China and to explore the factors associated with oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Methods: The original English version of GOHAI was translated, back-translated and cross-culturally adapted. The psychometric properties of GOHAI-M were assessed in a sample of 263 people aged 60 years and over and OHRQoL was examined in 221 subjects using GOHAI-M. Multiple regression analysis was conducted. Results: Internal consistency of the GOHAI-M was excellent (Cronbach's alpha : 0.81). Split-half reliability coefficient was 0.80, and item-scale correlation coefficient ranged from 0.25 to 0.71. Self-rated oral health was significantly associated with OHRQoL (r(s) = 0.505, p < 0.01). The relation coefficient between GOHAI-M and self-perceived need for dental treatment and number of missing teeth were 0.231 and -0.653, respectively (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis found that better OHRQoL was significantly associated with better self-ratings of oral health (beta = 0.497, p = 0.01), number of missing teeth (beta = 0.187, p < 0.01) and life satisfaction (beta = 0.132, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The Mandarin Chinese version of GOHAI demonstrates acceptable reliability and validity. OHRQoL is associated with self-rated oral health, number of missing teeth and satisfaction with life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available