4.6 Article

Discontinuous Galerkin methods for wave propagation in poroelastic media

Journal

GEOPHYSICS
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages T77-T97

Publisher

SOC EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICISTS
DOI: 10.1190/1.2965027

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Marie Curie Research and Training Network SPICE
  2. European Commission's Human Resources Mobility Program
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  4. DFG Forschungsstipendium [DU 1107/1-1]
  5. DFG-CNRS research group
  6. Noise Generation in Turbulent Flows
  7. Emmy Noether Program [KA2281/1-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed a new numerical method to solve the heterogeneous poroelastic wave equations in bounded three-dimensional domains. This method is a discontinuous Galerkin method that achieves arbitrary high-order accuracy on unstructured tetrahedral meshes for the low-frequency range and the inviscid case. By using Biot's equations and Darcy's dynamic laws, we have built a scheme that can successfully model wave propagation in fluid-saturated porous media when anisotropy of the pore structure is allowed. Zero-inflow fluxes are used as absorbing boundary conditions. A continuous arbitrary high-order derivatives time integration is used for the high-frequency inviscid case, whereas a space-time discontinuous scheme is applied for the low-frequency case. We conducted a numerical convergence test of the proposed methods. We used a series of examples to quantify the quality of our numerical results, comparing them to analytic solutions as well as numerical solutions obtained by other methodologies. In particular, a large scale 3D reservoir model showed the method's suitability to solve poroelastic wave-propagation problems for complex geometries using unstructured tetrahedral meshes. The resulting method is proved to be high-order accurate in space and time, stable for the low-frequency case, and asymptotically consistent with the diffusion limit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available