4.7 Article

Supercorotating return flow from reconnection in Saturn's magnetotail

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2010GL046149

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK STFC
  2. STFC
  3. U.S. Department of Energy
  4. NASA
  5. JPL [1356497]
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/E001076/1, ST/I00212X/1, ST/G007462/1, ST/H00260X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. UK Space Agency [PP/D00084X/1, ST/I002642/1, ST/J00460X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. STFC [PP/E001076/1, ST/I00212X/1, ST/H00260X/1, ST/G007462/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detecting plasma dynamics in Saturn's magnetosphere is essential for understanding energy flow through the system. It has been proposed that both the Dungey and Vasyliunas cycles operate at Saturn, and the competition between these cycles has been debated. We examine data taken by the Cassini spacecraft in Saturn's post-dawn magnetosphere, similar to 17.5 Saturn radii from the planet, and identify an example of return flow from magnetotail reconnection. The flow included water group ions and had elevated ion temperatures (of order 1 keV), consistent with Vasyliunas cycle return flow. The flow was also supercorotating (similar to 200 km s(-1), similar to 120% of corotation), which is highly atypical of Saturn's outer magnetosphere. Our results suggest that return flows are time-variable, and our results concerning Dungey cycle return flows are inconclusive. We propose that supercorotating flows in Saturn's dawn magnetosphere strongly influence the current system that is responsible for the planet's main auroral emission. Citation: Masters, A., M. F. Thomsen, S. V. Badman, C. S. Arridge, D. T. Young, A. J. Coates, and M. K. Dougherty (2011), Supercorotating return flow from reconnection in Saturn's magnetotail, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L03103, doi: 10.1029/2010GL046149.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available