4.6 Article

Characterizing the intracrustal low velocity zone beneath northwest India-Asia collision zone

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 199, Issue 3, Pages 1338-1353

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu328

Keywords

Ultra-high pressure metamorphism; Mantle processes; Crustal structure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Teleseismic data recorded at 13 broad-band seismological stations across northwest part of the Tethyan Himalaya and eastern Ladakh are analysed to determine the seismic characteristics of the crust and upper mantle beneath the northwest India-Asia collision zone. The receiver functions computed from teleseismic P-waveform for a wide range of backazimuth show strong azimuthal variation in the Indus suture zone (ISZ), the zone which marks the collision and subsequent subduction of both the Tethyan oceanic plate and Indian continental plate beneath Eurasia. The teleseismic waves piercing the ISZ do not show clear P-to-S (Ps) converted phase at the depth of Moho. In contrast, the waves piercing the Karakoram zone, Ladakh batholith and the Tethyan Himalayan region south of the ISZ clearly show the Moho converted Ps phase and corresponding inverted models reveal variation of crustal thickness from similar to 60 km beneath the Tethyan Himalaya to similar to 80 km beneath the Karakoram fault zone. A prominent intracrustal low velocity zone (IC-LVZ) is detected in the shear wave velocity models within the depth range similar to 15-40 km. The IC-LVZ identified at the stations both north and south of the ISZ can be interpreted as due to presence of fluid/partial melt. Our study provides compelling evidence that the mid-crustal low velocity zone does extend across the suture zone, in to the Tethyan Himalaya. The contact between this serpentinized ultramafic rocks and the eclogitized Indian continental crust in the suture zone is identified at similar to 47-50 km depth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available