4.6 Article

Determination of aeolian transport rates of volcanic soils in Iceland

Journal

GEOMORPHOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 4-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.10.039

Keywords

Wind erosion; Aeolian; Saltation; Andosols; Iceland; Dust

Funding

  1. Landsvirkjun Energy Company
  2. Icelandic Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sandy deserts cover >20000 km(2) in Iceland, consisting primarily of volcanic materials with basaltic volcanic glass being the main constituent. Wind erosion is severe in the country, causing dust pollution with widespread aeolian redistribution affecting most Icelandic ecosystems and sand movement over vegetated areas in the form of advancing sand fronts. We quantified wind erosion, using BSNE field samplers and automated sensors over several years at two sites with contrasting environments. The study sites are Holsfjoll with andic soil materials in the arid northeast highlands (<400 mm annual precipitation) and Geitasandur on sandy surfaces in the humid south lowlands (>1200 mm). Both areas show similar annual aeolian transport of 120->670 kg m(-1) yr(-1). Aeolian flux in storms at the NE site was 3-43 kg m(-1) h(-1) on average with up to >200 kg m-1 h-1 during gusts. Multiple regression shows potential flux of >200 kg m(-1) h(-1) during intense storms of >20 m s(-1) (at 2 m height). The research shows major aeolian activity in the humid South Iceland. Height distribution curves indicate considerable transport high above the surface at both sites (>60 cm). Stable height distribution curves for each location allow for measurements using single dust trap over long periods. The research explains the intense activity of advancing sand fronts in Iceland and the significance of continuously recharged sand sources for maintaining severe wind erosion in humid areas of Iceland. (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available