4.3 Article

Contribution of Anionic vs. Neutral Polymers to the Formation of Green Rust 1 from -FeOOH Bioreduction

Journal

GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 600-615

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01490451.2012.746403

Keywords

biominerals; green rust; iron reduction; lepidocrocite; magnetite; polyacrylamide; polyacrylic acid; Shewanella

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess the effect of polymeric substances on the biomineralization and stabilization of green rust (GR), the effect of two organic polymers on the transformation of lepidocrocite (-FeOOH) to GR vs. magnetite in presence of Shewanella putrefaciens was investigated. These two polymers, generally used as flocculants, are polyacrylic acid (PAA), which bears negatively charged carboxylic groups at neutral pH and is expected to react with cationic hydrolyzed iron species, and polyacrylamide (PAM), which is a neutral polymer that may develop hydrogen bonds with iron nanocolloids. The bioreduction of lepidocrocite by S. putrefaciens was performed under conditions known to yield either magnetite or GR. Each operational condition of interest was investigated with various polymer concentrations from 0.6 to 60mg g(1) Fe (10 to 1000mg l(1)). The final product was characterized using X-ray diffraction and electronic microscopy. The results showed that the formation of GR is favored, with respect to magnetite, to a lesser extent with PAM than with PAA. These results indicated that polymers influence the chemical stability of GR and/or guide the route of biomineralization. Polymer properties, in addition to silica and phosphate concentrations, are then critical parameters that control the secondary iron mineral biomineralization from iron-reducing bacteria. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Geomicrobiology Journal to view the supplemental file.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available