4.7 Article

Coseismic recrystallization during shallow earthquake slip

Journal

GEOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 63-66

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G33588.1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council [205175]
  2. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solidified frictional melts, or pseudotachylytes, remain the only unambiguous indicator of seismic slip in the geological record. However, pseudotachylytes form at >5 km depth, and there are many rock types in which they do not form at all. We performed low- to high-velocity rock friction experiments designed to impose realistic coseismic slip pulses on calcite fault gouges, and report that localized dynamic recrystallization may be an easy-to-recognize microstructural indicator of seismic slip in shallow, otherwise brittle fault zones. Calcite gouges with starting grain size <250 mu m were confined up to 26 MPa normal stress using a purpose-built sample holder. Slip velocities were between 0.01 and 3.4 m s(-1), and total displacements between 1 and 4 m. At coseismic slip velocities >= 0.1 m s(-1), the gouges were cut by reflective principal slip surfaces lined by polygonal grains <1 mu pm in size. The principal slip surfaces were flanked by <300 mu m thick layers of dynamically recrystallized calcite (grain size 1-10 mu m) containing well-defined shape- and crystallographic-preferred orientations. Dynamic recrystallization was accompanied by fault weakening and thermal decomposition of calcite to CO2 + CaO. The recrystallized calcite aggregates resemble those found along the principal slip surface of the Garam thrust, South Korea, exhumed from <5 km depth. We suggest that intense frictional heating along the experimental and natural principal slip surfaces resulted in localized dynamic recrystallization, a microstructure that may be diagnostic of seismic slip in the shallow crust.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available