4.7 Article

Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity modeling for porous media with two fractal regimes

Journal

GEODERMA
Volume 207, Issue -, Pages 268-278

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.05.023

Keywords

Fractal regime; Percolation theory; Pore-solid fractal model; Soil water retention curve; Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity

Categories

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy (DOE) Biological and Environmental Research (BER) through the Subsurface Biogeochemical Research (SBR) Science Focus Area (SFA) program at Pacific Northwest National laboratory (PNNL)
  2. Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL), Battelle contract [154808]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A reliable means to predict the saturation-dependence of the hydraulic conductivity would have important applications and implications across soil science. In our efforts to improve predictive capabilities we apply a bimodal pore size distribution to generate simultaneously the soil water retention curve (SWRC) and the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity K in porous media. Our specific pore size model incorporates two fractal regimes, which we treat within the pore-solid fractal approach. The calculation of the hydraulic conductivity employs critical path analysis from percolation theory, which has already been shown to perform the best overall among models commonly employed. To evaluate the developed piecewise functions, 8 soil samples with different textures, e.g., loam, silt loam, sandy loam and clay are selected. All soils show almost the same cross-over point on both water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves on semi-log plots. We find that the piecewise water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity models fit well the measured data. However, the hydraulic conductivity curves predicted from the water retention data agree relatively well with the measured one just for the first regime and tend to underestimate K in the second. We also compare our results with those obtained from unimodal pore-size distribution reported by Ghanbarian-Alavijeh and Hunt (2012). Comparing the measured data with the unimodal and bimodal models indicates that the bimodal distribution provide somewhat more realistic predictions than the unimodal one. If prediction is sacrificed and we simply try to model K using our results, we find that we can generate a very accurate phenomenological description of K with only a slight change in the values of the fractal dimensionality. Reasons for this discrepancy are discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available