4.7 Article

Illuminator, a desktop program for mutation detection using short-read clonal sequencing

Journal

GENOMICS
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 302-309

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.05.004

Keywords

Mutation detection; Sequence analysis; Clonal sequencing; Software

Funding

  1. UK Department of Health under the New and Emerging Applications of Technology (NEAT) [H033]
  2. Leeds Teaching Hospitals Charitable Trust
  3. Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust
  4. Emmandjay Charitable Trust
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I000623/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. The Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust [09JTA] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/I000623/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current methods for sequencing clonal populations of DNA molecules yield several gigabases of data per day, typically comprising reads of <100 nt. Such datasets permit widespread genome resequencing and transcriptome analysis or other quantitative tasks. However, this huge capacity can also be harnessed for the resequencing of smaller (gene-sized) target regions, through the simultaneous parallel analysis of multiple subjects, using sample tagging or indexing. These methods promise to have a huge impact on diagnostic mutation analysis and candidate gene testing. Here we describe a software package developed for such studies, offering the ability to resolve pooled samples carrying barcode tags and to align reads to a reference sequence using a mutation-tolerant process. The program, Illuminator, can identify rare sequence variants, including insertions and deletions, and permits interactive data analysis on standard desktop computers. It facilitates the effective analysis of targeted clonal sequencer data without dedicated computational infrastructure or specialized training. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available