4.2 Article

Impact of epistasis and QTL x environmental interaction on the mass filling rate during seed development of soybean

Journal

GENETICS RESEARCH
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 63-71

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1017/S0016672312000286

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National High Technology Project [2006AA10Z1F1]
  2. National Core Soybean Genetic Engineering Project [2008||ZX08004-002, 2009||ZX08004-002B, 2009ZX08009-089B]
  3. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [60932008, 30971810]
  4. National 973 Project [2009CB118400]
  5. Provincial/National Education Ministry for the teams of soybean molecular design

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seed filling rate of soybean has been shown to be a dynamic process in different developmental stages affected by both genotype and environment. The objective of the present study was to determine additive, epistatic and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) x environment interaction (QE) effects of the QTL underlying a seed filling rate of soybean. One hundred and forty-three recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from the cross of Charleston and Dongnong 594 were used with 2 years of field data (2004 and 2005). Eleven QTLs with significantly unconditional and conditional additive (a) effect and/or additive x environment interaction (ae) effect at different filling stages were identified. Of them six QTLs showed positive a effects and four QTLs had negative a effects on the seed filling rate during seed development. aa and aae effects of 12 pairs of QTLs were identified by unconditional mapping from the initial stage to the final stage. Thirteen pairs of QTLs underlying the seed filling rate with aa and aae effects were identified by conditional mapping. QTLs with aa and aae (additive x additive x environment) effects appeared to vary at different filling stages. Our results demonstrated that the mass filling rate in soybean seed were under genetic and environmental control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available