4.6 Article

Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value-development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT)

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 873-881

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.63

Keywords

discrete-choice experiment; incidental findings; patient preferences; whole-genome sequencing

Funding

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute [U01 HG0006507-01]
  2. University of Washington Northwest Institute of Genetic Medicine awarded from the Washington State Life Sciences Discovery Funds [265508]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Little is known about the factors that influence patients' preferences for the return of incidental findings from genome sequencing. This study identified attributes of incidental findings that were important to patients and developed a discrete-choice experiment instrument to quantify patient preferences. Methods: An initial set of key attributes and attribute levels was developed from a literature review and in consultation with experts. The attributes' salience and communication were refined using focus group methodology (n = 12) and cognitive interviews (n = 6) with patients who had received conventional genetic testing for familial colorectal cancer or polyposis syndromes. The attributes and levels used in the hypothetical choices presented to participants were identified using validated experimental design techniques. Results: The final discrete-choice experiment instrument incorporates the following attributes and levels: lifetime risk of disease (5, 40, 70%); disease treatability (medical, lifestyle, none); disease severity (mild, moderate, severe); carrier status (yes, no); drug response likelihood (high, moderate, none); and test cost ($250, $425, $1,000, $1,900). Conclusion: Patient preferences for incidental genomic findings are likely influenced by a complex set of diverse attributes. Quantification of patient preferences can inform patient provider communication by highlighting the attributes of incidental findings that matter most to patients and warrant further discussion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available