4.6 Article

A mosaic PTEN mutation causing Cowden syndrome identified by deep sequencing

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 1004-1007

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.51

Keywords

ColoSeq; Cowden syndrome; massively parallel sequencing; mosaic; mosaicism; next-generation sequencing; PTEN

Funding

  1. Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program [OC093285]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01CA157744]
  3. CDMRP [OC093285, 546094] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Mosaic PTEN mutations are not well described in Cowden syndrome. We report a 40-year-old woman with a clinical diagnosis of Cowden syndrome including Lhermitte-Duclos disease, who had a mosaic PTEN mutation detected by next-generation deep sequencing. Methods: Complete PTEN gene sequencing by the Sanger method and deletion/duplication analysis performed on DNA extracted from blood leukocytes at a commercial clinical laboratory did not identify a mutation. Because of high suspicion of a PTEN mutation, we repeated testing by next-generation sequencing using the ColoSeq assay, which sequences the entire PTEN locus at >320-fold average coverage. Results: ColoSeq identified a frameshift PTEN mutation (c.767_768delAG) in 1.7% of sequencing reads from peripheral blood leukocytes (21/1,184 reads), which is below the limit of detection of most Sanger sequencing methods. The mutation was detected at full heterozygous levels in skin fibroblasts and a cerebellar tumor, and at approximately the 25% level in colonic and endocervical mucosa, confirming somatic mosaicism. Conclusion: Our report highlights the power of deep next-generation sequencing to identify mosaic mutations that can be missed by traditional less sensitive approaches. We speculate that mosaic PTEN mutations are more common in Cowden syndrome than previously described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available