4.6 Article

Evaluation of newborn screening bloodspot-based genetic testing as second tier screen for bedside newborn hearing screening

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 1006-1010

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318226fc2e

Keywords

genetic testing; newborn hearing screening; connexin 26; GJB2; newborn screening

Funding

  1. March of Dimes [6-FY06-336]
  2. Minnesota Medical Foundation
  3. Vikings Children's Research Fund
  4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Bedside newborn hearing screening is highly successful in identifying deaf or hard-of-hearing infants. However, newborn hearing screening protocols have high loss to follow-up rates. We propose that bloodspot-based genetic testing for GJB2 alleles can provide a means for rapid confirmation in a subset of infants who fail bedside newborn hearing screening. Methods: We performed a case-control study comparing the prevalence of common GJB2 mutations from deidentified bloodspots designated as refer by newborn hearing screening and contemporaneously selected randomly chosen controls designated as pass. Between March 2006 and December 2007, 2354 spots were analyzed for common alleles, c.35delG, c.167delT, c.235delC, and p.V37I in GJB2 with a subset reanalyzed by conventional Sanger sequencing to search for additional alleles. Results: The prevalence of biallelic GJB2 mutations in bloodspots from infants who referred by newborn hearing screening is approximately 1 in 50 (23/1177). In contrast, one bloodspot from an infant who passed newborn hearing screening was identified to harbor biallelic GJB2 mutations. Conclusions: These findings show that when a newborn refers by newborn hearing screening, there is a significant chance that GJB2-related hearing loss is present. Bloodspot-based genetic testing for common GJB2 alleles should be considered as second tier testing for bedside newborn hearing screening. Genet Med 2011: 13(12): 1006-1010.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available