4.6 Editorial Material

Assessing the social impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Understanding sociotechnical architectures

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages 544-547

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181e71c70

Keywords

genetic testing; policy; personalized medicine; utility; ethics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To properly understand the social impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing, we must consider the sociotechnical architectures of these technologies-how developers design and assemble the human and technical components of individual testing systems to perform specific functions. In particular, the way testing systems perform their main functions-providing access to testing, analyzing genetic material, and conveying test results-influence the technology's utility and the distribution of expertise in the medical system. I illustrate this concept by comparing two systems that offer single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis, a relatively new type of genetic testing. I conclude by exploring how policy officials and other decision makers might intervene in the development of sociotechnical architectures to maximize the benefits of genomic technologies. Genet Med 2010:12(9):544-547.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available