4.3 Article

Effect of body fat distribution on the transcription response to dietary fat interventions

Journal

GENES AND NUTRITION
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 143-149

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12263-009-0122-9

Keywords

Dietary interventions; DNA microarrays; Lower body obesity (LBO); Upper body obesity (UBO); Medium-chain fatty acids (MCT); Long-chain fatty acids (PUFA)

Funding

  1. Dutch government, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, the Netherlands [04003]
  2. BU Biosciences, TNO Quality of life, The Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combination of decreased energy expenditure and increased food intake results in fat accumulation either in the abdominal site (upper body obesity, UBO) or on the hips (lower body obesity, LBO). In this study, we used microarray gene expression profiling of adipose tissue biopsies to investigate the effect of body fat distribution on the physiological response to two dietary fat interventions. Mildly obese UBO and LBO male subjects (n = 12, waist-to-hip ratio range 0.93-1.12) were subjected to consumption of diets containing predominantly either long-chain fatty acids (PUFA) or medium-chain fatty acids (MCT). The results revealed (1) a large variation in transcription response to MCT and PUFA diets between UBO and LBO subjects, (2) higher sensitivity of UBO subjects to MCT/PUFA dietary intervention and (3) the upregulation of immune and apoptotic pathways and downregulation of metabolic pathways (oxidative, lipid, carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism) in UBO subjects when consuming MCT compared with PUFA diet. In conclusion, we report that despite the recommendation of MCT-based diet for improving obesity phenotype, this diet may have adverse effect on inflammatory and metabolic status of UBO subjects. The body fat distribution is, therefore, an important parameter to consider when providing personalized dietary recommendation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available