4.4 Article

Serum Surfactant Protein D and Haptoglobin as Potential Biomarkers for Inflammatory Airway Disease in Horses

Journal

JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 1707-1711

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jvim.13602

Keywords

Acute phase proteins; Biomarker; Lung; sTREM-1

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [RGPIN-2014-06-198]
  2. Le Fonds du Centenaire
  3. Pfizer Clinical Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe identification of serum biomarkers of lung inflammation would facilitate the diagnosis of inflammatory airway disease (IAD) in horses. HypothesisHorses with IAD have higher serum concentrations of markers of inflammation compared to controls. AnimalsTwelve horses with IAD and 10 control horses. MethodsThis was a prospective case-control study. Blood and BALF were collected from horses with IAD and controls. Serum concentration of surfactant protein D (SP-D), haptoglobin, serum amyloid A (SAA) and of the soluble form of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (sTREM-1) was measured using commercial ELISA tests. ResultsHorses with IAD had higher serum concentration (log-transformed values) of SP-D (meanSD: 1.773 +/- 0.51), haptoglobin (6.657 +/- 0.202) and SAA (0.128 +/- 0.396) compared to controls (0.942 +/- 0.226, 6.38 +/- 0.22, -0.398 +/- 0.319, respectively; P<.01 for all). Furthermore, the concentrations of SP-D and haptoglobin combined allowed differentiating the 2 groups (IAD: 8.43 +/- 0.564, controls: 7.322 +/- 0.249, P<.0001) with a sensitivity and specificity of 100% when a cut-off of 7.70 (log value) was employed. Conclusions and Clinical ImportanceSurfactant protein D and haptoglobin serum concentrations could be a diagnostic aid in IAD. Further studies are necessary to establish the specificity of our findings before they can be applied in everyday practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available