4.6 Article

Structural biomass partitioning in regrowth and undisturbed mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa): implications for bioenergy uses

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 26-36

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01036.x

Keywords

allometry; cellulosic bioenergy; coppice; feedstock; rangeland; woody plant invasion

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Texas State Energy Conservation Office (SECO) [CM-406]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa Torr.) which grows on grasslands and rangelands in southwestern USA may have potential as a bioenergy feedstock because of existing standing biomass and regrowth potential. However, regrowth mesquite physiognomy is highly different from undisturbed mesquite physiognomy and little is known regarding growth rates and structural biomass allocation in regrowth mesquite. We compared canopy architecture, aboveground biomass and relative allocation of biomass components in regrowth (RG) trees of different known ages with undisturbed (UD) trees of similar canopy height to each RG age class. RG trees in most age classes (2-12 years old) had greater canopy area, leaf area, basal stem number, twig (< 0.5 cm diameter) mass and small stem (0.5-3 cm diameter) mass than UD trees of the same height. Large stem (> 3 cm diameter) mass was similar between RG and UD trees in all height classes. Ages of UD trees were determined after harvest and further comparisons were made between age, canopy structure and biomass in RG and UD trees. Relationships between age and total mass, age and height, and age and canopy area indicated a faster growth rate in RG than in UD trees. Large stem mass as a percentage of total tree mass accumulated more rapidly with age in RG than UD trees. Leaf area index and leaf : twig mass ratio were maintained near 1 in all RG and UD trees. Regrowth potential may be one of the most important features of mesquite in consideration as a bioenergy feedstock.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available