4.0 Article

Assessing the status of marl lakes under the European Union Water Framework Directive - insights from contemporary and palaeolimnological studies of three English lakes

Journal

FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED LIMNOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 2, Pages 121-138

Publisher

E SCHWEIZERBARTSCHE VERLAGSBUCHHANDLUNG
DOI: 10.1127/fal/2014/0648

Keywords

Ecological status; biodiversity; WFD; macrophytes; algae; nutrient enrichment; Characeae; Potamogetonaceae

Funding

  1. NERC
  2. Natural England PhD studentship [NE/F013086/1]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C515155/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods for ecological status assessment of high-alkalinity lakes under the Water Framework Directive (WED) differ between continental Europe and the UK. In the UK, marl lakes, i.e. carbonate-precipitating lakes, are placed in a separate category in which metrics account for the naturally low phosphorus content and sensitive macrophyte communities found therein. If this separation is appropriate, the UK method, which applies a correction factor for stricter assessment of marl lakes, should assess ecological status more effectively. Using contemporary macrophyte and chlorophyll-a data, this supposition was assessed for three English lakes by calculating ecological status with and without the correction factor. The veracity of the results was assessed using palaeolimnological and historical surveys. Further, the potential of macrophyte maximum colonisation depth (C-max) as an additional metric was investigated. For two lakes, the status suggested by historical-palaeolimnological data was poorer (Moderate) than that suggested by WED classification, both with and without the correction factor (Good and/or High). This has important implications as restoration is required only for water bodies classed below Good. For the third lake, for which high chlorophyll-a resulted in Poor status in agreement with historical-palaeolimnological data, the discrepancy between the macrophyte metrics with and without the correction factor was considerable (Poor, Moderate, respectively). The results suggest that a separate marl lake category is warranted and may be advisable for other Member States in continental Europe. Importantly, status was higher than recommended for the two lakes close to the Good/Moderate boundary even with the correction factor. This leads us to recommend more studies be undertaken on eutrophication responses of marl lakes. In lakes where macrophyte species composition varies with water depth, eutrophication is apparent through reductions in C-max especially of Characeae and Potamogetonaceae. C-max is simple to measure and may much improve the reliability of marl lake assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available