4.5 Article

Conserved globulin gene across eight grass genomes identify fundamental units of the loci encoding seed storage proteins

Journal

FUNCTIONAL & INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 111-122

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10142-009-0135-x

Keywords

Wheat; High molecular weight glutenin; Globulin; Duplication; Genome evolution; Domestication

Funding

  1. NSF [DBI-0638558]
  2. United State Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service CRIS [532502100-000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The wheat high molecular weight (HMW) glutenins are important seed storage proteins that determine bread-making quality in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum). In this study, detailed comparative sequence analyses of large orthologous HMW glutenin genomic regions from eight grass species, representing a wide evolutionary history of grass genomes, reveal a number of lineage-specific sequence changes. These lineage-specific changes, which resulted in duplications, insertions, and deletions of genes, are the major forces disrupting gene colinearity among grass genomes. Our results indicate that the presence of the HMW glutenin gene in Triticeae genomes was caused by lineage-specific duplication of a globulin gene. This tandem duplication event is shared by Brachypodium and Triticeae genomes, but is absent in rice, maize, and sorghum, suggesting the duplication occurred after Brachypodium and Triticeae genomes diverged from the other grasses similar to 35 Ma ago. Aside from their physical location in tandem, the sequence similarity, expression pattern, and conserved cis-acting elements responsible for endosperm-specific expression further support the paralogous relationship between the HMW glutenin and globulin genes. While the duplicated copy in Brachypodium has apparently become nonfunctional, the duplicated copy in wheat has evolved to become the HMW glutenin gene by gaining a central prolamin repetitive domain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available