4.7 Article

Effect of modifiers in n-pentane on the supercritical extraction of Athabasca bitumen

Journal

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 10, Pages 1929-1938

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.05.010

Keywords

Solvent; Bitumen; Supercritical extraction; Deasphalted oil; Asphaltenes; Metals

Funding

  1. Alberta Innovates Energy and Environment Solutions (AIEES)
  2. Alberta Innovates Technology Futures (AITF)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experiments involving the supercritical extraction of bitumen using various solvent mixtures were carried out in a 2-1 batch autoclave to determine the effect of modifier type and concentration on deasphalted oil (DAO) yield and quality. Athabasca bitumen was used as the feedstock and n-pentane was used as the primary solvent for extraction. Acetone, toluene, methanol and ethyl acetate were each added to n-pentane as modifiers in different concentrations to form the solvent mixtures. Extraction temperatures and pressures were maintained at around 200 degrees C and 1100 psi to achieve supercritical conditions for solvents, and the solvent-to-feed volume ratio was kept around 6.5. Higher DAO yields were obtained with increasing modifier concentrations in n-pentane. DAO yields ranged from 79 to 92 wt.% of the bitumen, with n-pentane/toluene mixtures providing the highest yields and n-pentane/methanol mixtures producing the lowest. Increases in DAD yield were accompanied by higher nickel, vanadium, nitrogen, sulfur and microcarbon residue content in DAO. Moreover, it was found that n-pentane/methanol and n-pentane/acetone solvent mixtures had lower selectivities for metals impurities than the other modifiers, while n-pentane/toluene had the highest selectivities. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available