4.7 Article

NO formation tendency characterization for solid fuels in fluidized beds

Journal

FUEL
Volume 108, Issue -, Pages 238-246

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.011

Keywords

Nitrogen oxides; Solid fuel; Fluidized bed combustion; Characterization; Fuel nitrogen

Funding

  1. TEKES the National Technology Agency of Finland
  2. Andritz Oy
  3. Foster Wheeler Energia Oy
  4. Kvaerner Power Oy
  5. Vattenfall Utveckling AB
  6. Metsa Botnia Oy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Usually the standard fuel analysis is not enough to allow for accurate NO emission predictions in large scale fluidized bed combustion. This paper presents NO formation tendency characterization results from novel laboratory measurements in a small-scale fluidized bed combustor. With the special two-stage oxidation method it is possible to eliminate the observed problems of unstable test conditions during rapid pyrolysis of high-volatile fuels in batch combustion. Experimental results of the conversion of fuel nitrogen to NO are presented for wide range of fuels, ranging from coal-type fuels to peat, biomasses and wastes. A NO formation tendency database is formed based on the results. The combustion test results show that the cumulative conversion of fuel nitrogen to NO under lean, non-staged fluidized bed combustion is 20-50% (850 degrees C with O-2 in excess). For biomass, peat and wastes, nearly all reactive nitrogen (forming NO) is released from the fuel during pyrolysis. NO formation during char combustion is significant with coal. The data is also compared with corresponding data from literature, with reasonable agreement. The results presented here can be used as inputs for the prediction of NO emission in large-scale fluidized bed boilers with air staging. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available