Neural correlates of moral and non-moral emotion in female psychopathy
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Neural correlates of moral and non-moral emotion in female psychopathy
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Online
2014-09-25
DOI
10.3389/fnhum.2014.00741
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Good, the Bad, and the Just: Justice Sensitivity Predicts Neural Response during Moral Evaluation of Actions Performed by Others
- (2014) K. J. Yoder et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
- An fMRI study of affective perspective taking in individuals with psychopathy: imagining another in pain does not evoke empathy
- (2013) Jean Decety et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions
- (2013) J. Koster-Hale et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Neural processing of dynamic emotional facial expressions in psychopaths
- (2013) Jean Decety et al. Social Neuroscience
- Not just fear and sadness: Meta-analytic evidence of pervasive emotion recognition deficits for facial and vocal expressions in psychopathy
- (2012) Amy Dawel et al. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
- The neural signatures of distinct psychopathic traits
- (2012) Justin M. Carré et al. Social Neuroscience
- The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex
- (2011) Alexander J. Shackman et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Utilitarian moral judgment in psychopathy
- (2011) Michael Koenigs et al. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
- Where in the brain is morality? Everywhere and maybe nowhere
- (2011) Liane Young et al. Social Neuroscience
- Neural development of mentalizing in moral judgment from adolescence to adulthood
- (2011) Carla L. Harenski et al. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
- Similarities and differences in perceiving threat from dynamic faces and bodies. An fMRI study
- (2010) M.E. Kret et al. NEUROIMAGE
- Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments
- (2010) L. Young et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- No volumetric differences in the anterior cingulate of psychopathic individuals
- (2010) Andrea L. Glenn et al. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
- Psychopaths know right from wrong but don’t care
- (2010) Maaike Cima et al. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
- Localization of Deformations Within the Amygdala in Individuals With Psychopathy
- (2009) Yaling Yang et al. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
- Neuroticism and psychopathy predict brain activation during moral and nonmoral emotion regulation
- (2009) C. L. Harenski et al. COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE
- A functional imaging investigation of moral deliberation and moral intuition
- (2009) Carla L. Harenski et al. NEUROIMAGE
- Innocent intentions: A correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity☆
- (2009) Liane Young et al. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
- Amygdala Hypoactivity to Fearful Faces in Boys With Conduct Problems and Callous-Unemotional Traits
- (2008) Alice P. Jones et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- The neural correlates of moral decision-making in psychopathy
- (2008) A L Glenn et al. MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY
- Gender differences in neural mechanisms underlying moral sensitivity
- (2008) Carla L. Harenski et al. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
- Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis
- (2007) Abigail A. Marsh et al. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started