4.7 Article

Determination of urinary malondialdehyde by isotope dilution LC-MS/MS with automated solid-phase extraction: A cautionary note on derivatization optimization

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 1823-1829

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.08.012

Keywords

Lipid peroxidation; Oxidative stress; LC-MS/MS; Malondialdehyde; Free radicals

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 97-2314-B-040-015-MY3, NSC 99-2314-B-040-018-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A highly sensitive quantitative LC-MS/MS method was developed for measuring urinary malondialdehyde (MDA). With the use of an isotope internal standard and online solid-phase extraction, urine samples can be directly analyzed within 10 min after 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) derivatization. The detection limit was estimated as 0.08 pmol. This method was further applied to assess the optimal addition of DNPH for derivatization and to measure urinary MDA in 80 coke oven emission (COE)-exposed and 67 nonexposed workers. Derivatization optimization revealed that to achieve complete derivatization reaction, an excess of DNPH is required (DNPH/MDA molar ratio: 893-8929) for urine samples that is about 100 times higher than that of MDA standard solutions (molar ratio: 10-80). Meanwhile, the mean urinary concentrations of MDA in COE-exposed workers were significantly higher than those in nonexposed workers (0.23 +/- 0.17 vs 0.14 +/- 0.05 mu mol/mmol creatinine, P<0.005). Urinary MDA concentrations were also significantly associated with the CUE (P<0.005) and smoking exposure (P<0.05). Taken together, this method is capable of routine high-throughput analysis and accurate quantification of MDA and would be useful for assessing the whole-body burden of oxidative stress. Our findings, however, raise the issue that derivatization optimization should be performed before it is put into routine biological analysis. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available