4.7 Article

Differences in doxorubicin-induced apoptotic signaling in adult and immature cardiomyocytes

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 45, Issue 12, Pages 1723-1728

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.006

Keywords

Cardiomyocytes; Apoptosis; Doxorubicin; Caspases; Cyrochrome c

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA77822]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A proposed mechanism for the cardiotoxicity of doxorubicin (DOX) involves apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. In the study described here, we investigated the molecular basis for the differences in DOX-induced toxicity in adult rat cardiomyocytes (ARCM), neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (NRCM), and rat embryonic H9c2 cardiomyoblasts. Activation of caspase-9 and -3 was considerably lower in DOX-treated ARCM as compared with NRCM and H9c2 cardiomyoblasts. Addition of cytochrome c caused the activation of caspase-9 and -3 in permeabilized NRCM and H9c2 cardiomyoblasts but not in permeabilized ARCM. Expression of proapoptotic proteins, apoptotic protease activating factor-1 (Apaf1), and procaspase-9 was significantly lower, and abundance of antiapoptotic X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) was higher in ARCM, as compared with immature cardiac cells. Despite the abundance of XIAP in ARCM, its role in the inhibition of apoptosome function was dismissed, as second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (Smac)-N7 peptide, had no effect on caspase activation in response to cytochrome c in these cells. Adenoviral expression of Apaf1 exacerbated the activation of caspase-9 and -3 in DOX-treated NRCM, but did not increase their activities in DOX-treated ARCM. This finding points to a major difference in the apoptotic signaling between immature and adult cardiomyocytes. The mitochondrial apoptotic pathway is limited in ARCM treated with DOX (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available