4.7 Article

Effects of auxiliary data source and inventory unit size on the efficiency of sample-based coarse woody debris inventory

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 259, Issue 10, Pages 1890-1899

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.02.001

Keywords

Aerial photographs; Airborne laser scanning; Auxiliary information; Sample-based CWD inventory; Sample unit size; Stand-register data

Categories

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [116313]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [116313, 116313] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficiency of a sample-based inventory can be greatly improved if lower cost information on the study area is utilized. It has been observed that the use of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data in the design phase may improve the efficiency of dead wood (coarse woody debris, CWD) volume inventory notably, i.e. a smaller standard error of the mean is observed with the same inventory costs. In the present case, several auxiliary data sources were employed in the design phase by using 'probability proportional to size' sampling to select the sample units to be inventoried in the field. It was observed that a combination of ALS data with either aerial photographs or stand-register data can improve the sampling efficiency even more than the use of ALS as a single data source. Since these additional data sources are often gathered for the inventory of living trees, their use does not incur extra expenses for CWD assessment. Thus, the use of these data separately or together with ALS data can greatly improve the cost-efficiency of a CWD volume inventory. It was also observed that the size of the sample units has a slight effect on the sampling efficiency. Even though the improvement in the sampling efficiency was usually greater with larger sample unit sizes, the CWD volume inventory was most efficient with moderate grid cell sizes. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available