4.7 Article

Severely insect-damaged forest: A temporary trap for red squirrels?

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 257, Issue 2, Pages 464-470

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.020

Keywords

Isolation; Endangered species; Habitat selection; Home range; Survival; Southeastern Arizona

Categories

Funding

  1. Arizona Game & Fish Department
  2. USDA Forest Service
  3. University of Arizona's office of the Vice President for Research
  4. Steward Observatory
  5. Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station
  6. TE Incorporated

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent insect infestations in the spruce-fir forest in the Pinaleno Mountains of southeastern Arizona provided an opportunity to document response to severe forest disturbance and existence of an ecological trap for an endemic montane isolate, the endangered Mt. Graham red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus grahamensis). From September 2003 to December 2005 we assessed habitat selection and home range dynamics, and monitored potential correlates of fitness (body mass, reproduction, survivorship) in red squirrels living in insect-damaged forest, while drawing comparisons to squirrels inhabiting undamaged mixed-conifer forest. Although Mt. Graham red squirrels demonstrate equal-preference for habitat within insect-damaged forests and reproduce as well as individuals in undamaged forest, poor survivorship and reduced potential to reproduce suggest insect-damaged forest may function as an ecological trap. In addition, areas selected within insect-damaged forest had <69% dead trees, suggesting an upper limit to the extent of tree mortality tolerated by red squirrels. Habitat selection and sensitivity to disturbance will influence use of insect-damaged areas by forest-dwelling species. Although insect-damaged forest may retain habitat patches for a few individuals, low survivorship may generate an ecological trap. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available