Comparison of the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS)
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparison of the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS)
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 35, Issue 10, Pages 1031-1036
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Online
2014-07-12
DOI
10.1177/1071100714543647
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) in forefoot, hindfoot, and ankle disorders
- (2014) Maria C Cöster et al. Acta Orthopaedica
- Interrater reliability of clinical tests to evaluate scapulothoracic motion
- (2013) Evelyn Baertschi et al. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
- The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain
- (2013) Tina Juul et al. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
- Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Foot and Ankle Research
- (2013) Kenneth J Hunt et al. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
- Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS)
- (2012) Maria Cöster et al. Acta Orthopaedica
- Life without the AOFAS Score: A Critical Problem in a Time of Scarcity
- (2012) D. Joshua Mayich FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL
- Responsiveness and Validity of the SF-36, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score, and Foot Function Index in End Stage Ankle Arthritis
- (2012) N. Jane Madeley et al. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL
- Responsiveness of the Manchester–Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery
- (2012) J. Dawson et al. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME
- Measuring foot and ankle injury outcomes: Common scales and checklists
- (2011) Patricia Farrugia et al. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED
- The population prevalence of foot and ankle pain in middle and old age: A systematic review
- (2011) Martin J. Thomas et al. PAIN
- Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist
- (2011) Caroline B. Terwee et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- The Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics?
- (2010) Kim E Wamper et al. Acta Orthopaedica
- The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content
- (2010) Lidwine B Mokkink et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
- (2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study
- (2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Which Are the Most Frequently Used Outcome Instruments in Studies on Total Ankle Arthroplasty?
- (2009) Florian D. Naal et al. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started