4.7 Article

Discrimination of moldy peanuts with reference to aflatoxin using FTIR-ATR system

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages 64-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.03.045

Keywords

FTIR-ATR; Peanut; Aspergillus flavus; Aspergillus parasiticus; PLS regression; Discriminant analysis

Funding

  1. USAID

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrated the potential use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, coupled with attenuated total reflectance unit (FTIR-ATR) for determination of aflatoxigenic and non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus invasion in peanuts. Threshold mold density on peanut paste samples was 2.7 Log CFU/g peanut corresponding to legislative limiting aflatoxin (AF) level of 20 ppb. Classification was performed to separate the Acceptable stream (AF <= 20 ppb) from so called Moldy (20 < AF < 1200 ppb) and Highly Moldy (>1200 ppb). All of the samples (n = 164) were classified correctly when discriminant analysis technique was employed. Second threshold value was set at 300 ppb aflatoxin to further sort out the samples in the Moldy class into mildly (which can be used for feed) or highly toxic (which has to be discarded). Correct separation was observed at 98.5% with only one misclassified sample. Growth profiles of both strains of A. flavus and A. parasiticus were interpreted with respect to spectral changes. Even when spectral alterations for aflatoxin presence were not clearly identifiable, similar secondary metabolites of both aflatoxigenic species led to clusters in distance plots and showed the potential usage of the developed method to separate safer peanuts (e.g. AF <= 20 ppb) in a lot when implemented. Partial least squares (PLS) regression models were developed to predict AF level with maximum correlation coefficient of determination (R-C(2) = 99.98% for both AF-producing Aspergillus spp.). The fingerprint region (1800-800 cm(-1)) was used for regression analysis and corresponding bands were interpreted. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available