4.7 Article

Distribution of tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance genes in aerobic bacteria isolated from cooked meat products in Guangzhou, China

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 30-34

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.042

Keywords

Cooked meat products; Antimicrobial resistance; Tetracycline; Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole

Funding

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB35704, 2012CB723705]
  2. Guangzhou technological planning projects [11C12080718]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, SCUT [2012ZZ0083]
  4. Food Safety Key Lab of Liaoning Province Open Project Funding [LNSAKF2011002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial resistance to tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and the prevalence of corresponding resistant genes of aerobic bacteria isolated from cooked meat products in Guangzhou. Among the 169 tested isolates, 55 (32.5%) exhibited resistance to tetracycline and 40 (23.7%) were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Among tetracycline resistance genes, tetM (14.2%) was found in the highest frequency followed by tetA (10.1%). tetS (5.9%), and tetB (2.9%). Among trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistant genes, sulI (10.6%) was observed in the highest frequency which was twofold higher than sulII (5.3%). Multiple antimicrobial resistance genes were detected in 19 of 169 (11.2%) bacteria. One strain of Citrobacter freundii and one strain of Escherichia coli contained five antimicrobial resistance genes. The presence of resistance genes in isolates from cooked meats indicate that these bacteria may act as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance genes and could play a role in the dissemination of resistant genes along the food chain. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available