4.7 Article

Phosphatase activity and its relationship with physical and chemical parameters during vermicomposting of filter cake and cattle manure

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages 1223-1230

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7210

Keywords

organic residues; recycling; organic phosphorus; humic-enzyme interactions; CP-MAS C-13 NMR spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Brazil (CNPq)
  2. Rio de Janeiro State Foundation of Research (FAPERJ)
  3. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDRecycling of phosphorus (P) from organic residues (ORs) is important to develop environmentally friendly agriculture. The use of this P source depends on phosphatase enzymes, which can be affected by a chain of parameters during maturation of ORs. In this study the phosphatase activity levels throughout vermicomposting of filter cake (FC) and cattle manure (CM) were correlated with different physical and chemical parameters in an effort to increase the knowledge about recycling of P from ORs. RESULTSFC presented higher total nitrogen content (TNC), total organic carbon (TOC), humic acid (HA) content, water-soluble P (WSP), phosphatase activities and nanopore volume than CM during vermicomposting. Decreases in TOC of CM resulted from carbohydrate mineralization, which was not observed for FC. CM showed increased hydrophobic index during vermicomposting while FC showed a slight decrease. CONCLUSIONPhosphatase activities correlated positively with TOC, pH and WSP and negatively with HA content for both vermicomposts. Nanopore volume was negatively correlated with phosphatase activities for FC but not for CM. No correlations between hydrophobicity and phosphatase activities were found for FC. Increased hydrophobicity throughout vermicomposting of CM could be partially associated with decreases in phosphatase levels. (c) 2015 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available