4.1 Article

Meat as complementary food for older breastfed infants and toddlers: A randomized, controlled trial in rural China

Journal

FOOD AND NUTRITION BULLETIN
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages S188-S192

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15648265140354S304

Keywords

Breastfeeding; complementary feeding; growth; linear growth; meat

Funding

  1. Thrasher Foundation [02827-4]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08PJ14082]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172686]
  4. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition [11DZ2260500]
  5. NIH [K24 DK083772-09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Because of its contribution to dietary diversity and to favorable intakes of micro nutrients, including iron and zinc, meat is hypothesized to be a valuable complementary food for the infant and young child. However, the evidence base remains limited. Objective. To compare the difference in anthropometric measurements of rural Chinese infants and toddlers 6 to 18 months of age who received a daily supplement of meat or cereal for 12 months. Methods. This cluster-randomized, controlled study provided a daily supplement of either meat (n = 514, 20 clusters) or cereal (n = 957, 40 clusters) starting as a first complementary food at 6 months of age. Anthropometric measurements were assessed longitudinally. Results. After 12 months of intervention, the meat group (Delta 13.01 +/- 1.9 cm) had greater (p = .01) linear growth than the cereal group (Delta 12.75 +/- 1.8 cm) and a smaller decrease in length-for-age z-score (LAZ) over time (-0.43 +/- 0.72 in the meat group vs. -0.54 +/- 0.67 in the cereal group), after adjustment for baseline length, LAZ, maternal education, work status, and maternal height and weight. Conclusions. Linear growth was modestly greater in the meat group than in the cereal group. LAZ was substantially negative at 6 months, and the intervention did not prevent ongoing decline over the course of the study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available