4.7 Article

Alterations in oxidative stress biomarkers associated with mild hyperlipidemia and smoking

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 3-4, Pages 920-926

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.12.031

Keywords

Oxidative stress; Hyperlipidemia; Hypercholesterolemia; Cigarette smoking

Funding

  1. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences [86-4070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative stress may increase the risk of atherosclerosis. The association of mild forms of hyperlipidemia, particularly primary hypertriglyceridemia, with oxidative stress has not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the alterations in oxidative stress biomarkers associated with three major types of mild untreated hyperlipidemia (hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia and combined hyperlipidemia) in nonsmoker and smoker individuals. Five biomarkers were measured in 139 adult healthy men (83 nonsmokers and 56 smokers, ages 18-75), which included normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic subjects. Triglyceride levels were associated with a significant main effect on ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 8-iso-prostaglandin F-2 alpha (iPF(2 alpha)) levels in plasma (p < 0.05 and p < 0.005, respectively). Smokers with hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia and combined hyperlipidemia had alterations in 1, 3 and 2 oxidative stress biomarkers compared to nonsmoker normolipidemics. Smokers (including normolipidemics and hyperlipidemics) had higher plasma FRAP (120.8 vs. 102.0 mu M quercetin/l, p < 0.05) and erythrocyte catalase activity (5125 vs. 4093 U/g Hb, p < 0.01), while they had lower erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity (20.3 vs. 23.0 U/g Hb, p < 0.05) compared to nonsmokers. These findings show that mild forms of hyperlipidemia, particularly in smokers, are associated with alterations in some oxidative stress biomarkers. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available