4.7 Article

Ameliorative effects of SLC22A2 gene polymorphism 808 G/T and cimetidine on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in Chinese cancer patients

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 7, Pages 2289-2293

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.03.077

Keywords

Cisplatin; Nephrotoxicity; Cimetidine; SLC22A2 gene; Organic cation transporter 2

Funding

  1. Department of Oncology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
  2. Immune Pharmacology Laboratory Services, Shandong University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the roles of SLC22A2 gene polymorphism 808 G/T and cimetidine on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, a total of 123 Chinese cancer patients treated with cisplatin alone (n = 55) or in combination with cimetidine (n = 68) were genotyped. The changes of serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and cystatin C levels were used as biomarkers for the evaluation of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. The changes of BUN and SCr levels showed no significant difference between groups divided by genotypes and treatments (P > 0.05). However, patients with mutant genotype (GT/TT) or with cimetidine treatment had smaller increase of the cystatin C levels compared to those with wild genotype (GC) or without cimetidine treatment (P < 0.05). In the non-cimetidine-treated group, the changes of cystatin C level in patients with mutant genotype (GT/TT) was significantly smaller than those with wild genotype (GG) (P = 0.043). In the wild type group, the cystatin C level change of patients without cimetidine treatment was significantly larger than those with cimetidine treatment (P = 0.007). These results suggested that SLC22A2 gene polymorphism 808 G/T and cimetidine could attenuate cisplatin nephrotoxicity in Chinese cancer patients. But the renoprotection mechanism of cimetidine might be damaged by the mutation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available