4.5 Article

Size selectivity of standardized multimesh gillnets in sampling coarse European species

Journal

FISHERIES RESEARCH
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 51-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.09.017

Keywords

Gillnet; Seine; Roach; Perch; Rudd; Size selectivity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied gillnet selectivity by using a direct method to compare fish-size distributions from gillnet catches (Nordic type, mesh size range 5-135 mm, knot-to-knot, factor between adjacent mesh sizes 1.25) with a reference distribution obtained using beach seines for fry and adult fish (net length 10, 40 and 50 m. mesh size 1, 6 and 10 mm, respectively) in five Czech reservoirs. Target species were roach Rutilus rutilus (L.), perch Perca fluviatilis L. and rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L). The most common pattern of difference in fish-size distributions between the two gears was that more 0+ and 1+ year old fish were caught by beach seines and slightly higher proportions of larger fish were observed in gillnet catches. For the three species, gillnets were unable to enmesh fish smaller than approximately 40 mm in standard length. We developed average species-specific corrections that increased proportions of 0+ and 1+ year old fish and decreased proportions of larger fish. However, the average correction gave corrected size distributions that were biased in about 20% of cases. We also applied Kurkilahti's correction given in European Standard EN 14757, but it had a negligible effect on reducing the bias in size distributions. Future research is needed to develop more accurate corrections for size distributions, otherwise interpreting results from gillnet sampling can be very misleading especially for those including data on 0+ and 1+ year old fish. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available