4.6 Article

Topology optimization of space vehicle structures considering attitude control effort

Journal

FINITE ELEMENTS IN ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
Volume 45, Issue 6-7, Pages 431-438

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2008.12.002

Keywords

Structural optimization; Topology optimization; Attitude control; Moment of inertia; Optimality criteria method

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [90305019, 10721062, 90816025]
  2. National 973 Program of China [2006CB705403]
  3. NCET program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The topology optimization of load-bearing structural components for reducing attitude control efforts of miniature space vehicles is investigated. Based on the derivation of the cold gas consumption rate of three-axis stabilization actuators, it is pointed out that the attitude control efforts associated with cold gas micro thrusters are closely related to the mass moment inertia of the system. Therefore, the need to restrict the mass moments of inertia of the structural components is highlighted in the design of the load-bearing structural components when the attitude control performance is concerned. The optimal layout design of the space vehicle structure considering attitude control effort is, thus, reformulated as a topology optimization problem for minimum compliance under constraints on mass moments of inertia. Numerical techniques for the optimization problem are discussed. For the case of a single constraint on the mass moment of inertia about a given axis, a design variable updating scheme based on the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimality criteria is used to solve the minimization problem. For the problem with multiple constraints, mathematical programming approach is employed to seek the optimum. Numerical examples will be given to demonstrate the validity and applicability of the present problem statement. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available