Journal
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages 1375-U41Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.051
Keywords
Comprehensive chromosome screening; preimplantation genetic screening; array comparative genomic hybridization; next-generation sequencing; embryo aneuploidy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: To validate a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based method for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening and to investigate its applicability to preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). Design: Retrospective blinded study. Setting: Reference laboratory. Patient(s): Karyotypically defined chromosomally abnormal single cells and whole-genome amplification (WGA) products, previously analyzed by array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH), selected from 68 clinical PGS cycles with embryos biopsied at cleavage stage. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Consistency of NGS-based diagnosis of aneuploidy compared with either conventional karyotyping of single cells or array-CGH diagnoses of single blastomeres. Result(s): Eighteen single cells and 190 WGA products from single blastomeres, were blindly evaluated with the NGS-based protocol. In total, 4,992 chromosomes were assessed, 402 of which carried a copy number imbalance. NGS specificity for aneuploidy call (consistency of chromosome copy number assignment) was 99.98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 99.88%-100%) with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 99.08%-100%). NGS specificity for aneuploid embryo call (24-chromosome diagnosis consistency) was 100% (95% CI 94.59%-100%) with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 97.39%-100%). Conclusion(s): This is the first study reporting extensive preclinical validation and accuracy assessment of NGS-based comprehensive aneuploidy screening on single cells. Given the high level of consistency with an established methodology, such as array-CGH, NGS has demonstrated a robust high-throughput methodology ready for clinical application in reproductive medicine, with potential advantages of reduced costs and enhanced precision. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available