4.7 Article

Examining the temperature of embryo culture in in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial comparing traditional core temperature (37°C) to a more physiologic, cooler temperature (36°C)

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages 767-773

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.009

Keywords

Culture temperature; embryo development; human embryo culture; in vitro fertilization

Funding

  1. RMAPA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether culture at a more physiologically cooler temperature, as suggested by limited human and animal data, would improve blastulation and pregnancy rates in human clinical IVF. Design: Paired randomized controlled trial. Setting: Academic. Patient(s): Infertile couples (n = 52) with a female partner less than 42 years old with eight or more mature oocytes retrieved. Intervention(s): Mature oocytes obtained from a single cohort of oocytes were randomly divided into two groups; one was cultured at 37 degrees C and the other at 36 degrees C from the time of ICSI to the time of embryo transfer or vitrification. Paired embryo transfers were accomplished by transferring one euploid embryo from each group. DNA fingerprinting was used as needed to determine the outcome for each embryo. Main Outcome Measure(s): Rate of development of expanded blastocysts suitable for transfer or vitrification (primary outcome), fertilization, aneuploidy, and sustained implantation. Result(s): A total of 805 mature oocytes were cultured; 399 at 36 degrees C and 406 at 37 degrees C. Paired analysis demonstrated a higher rate of usable blastocyst formation per zygote at 37 degrees C (48.4%) vs. at 36 degrees C (41.2%). Rates of fertilization, aneuploidy, and sustained implantation were equivalent. Conclusion(s): IVF culture at 36 degrees C does not improve clinically relevant parameters of embryo development or sustained implantation rates. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available