4.7 Article

Psychological distress and in vitro fertilization outcome

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 459-464

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.023

Keywords

In vitro fertilization; psychological distress

Funding

  1. National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health [PO1 HD37074]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine whether psychological distress predicts IVF treatment outcome as well as whether IVF treatment outcome predicts subsequent psychological distress. Design: Prospective cohort study over an 18-month period. Setting: Five community and academic fertility practices. Patient(s): Two hundred two women who initiated their first IVF cycle. Intervention(s): Women completed interviews and questionnaires at baseline and at 4, 10, and 18 months' follow-up. Main Outcome Measure(s): IVF cycle outcome and psychological distress. Result(s): In a binary logistic model including covariates (woman's age, ethnicity, income, education, parity, duration of infertility, and time interval), pretreatment depression and anxiety were not significant predictors of the outcome of the first IVF cycle. In linear regression models including covariates (woman's age, income, education, parity, duration of infertility, assessment point, time since last treatment cycle, and pre-IVF depression or anxiety), experiencing failed IVF was associated with higher post-IVF depression and anxiety. Conclusion(s): IVF failure predicts subsequent psychological distress, but pre-IVF psychological distress does not predict IVF failure. Instead of focusing efforts on psychological interventions specifically aimed at improving the chance of pregnancy, these findings suggest that attention be paid to helping patients prepare for and cope with treatment and treatment failure. (Fertil Steril (R) 2012;98:459-64. (C) 2012 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available