4.7 Article

Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support for day 3 cryopreserved embryo transfer

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages 1464-1469

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.007

Keywords

Crinone vaginal gel; intramuscular progesterone; luteal phase support; frozen; pregnancy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare outcomes after intramuscular progesterone (IMP) or 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal support for day 3 cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET). Design: Retrospective cohort study with multivariable analysis. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): All autologous and donor egg in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients who had a day 3 CET from January 1, 2008, to April 30, 2011, with luteal support using 25-50 mg/d IMP or 8% Crinone twice daily, initiated 3 days before the CET. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation rate, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates per CET. Result(s): IMP (n = 440) and Crinone (n = 298) recipients were similar for all demographic characteristics and cycle parameters assessed. Although implantation rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (Crinone vs. IMP: 19.6% vs. 30.4%), women supplemented with Crinone had significantly lower rates of clinical pregnancy (36.9% vs. 51.1%) and live birth (24.4% vs. 39.1%) compared with those on IMP. Conclusion(s): We observed that day 3 CET cycles with 8% Crinone luteal support had a 44% and 49% lower odds of clinical pregnancy and live birth, respectively, compared with those with IMP support. Further studies are required to identify the optimal timing and dose of 8% Crinone vaginal gel for use in CET cycles. (Fertil Steril (R) 2012;98:1464-9. (C) 2012 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available