4.7 Article

The benefit of human chorionic gonadotropin supplementation throughout the secretory phase of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 351-354

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.027

Keywords

hCG; frozen-thawed embryo transfer; implantation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess whether supplementation with hCG throughout the secretory phase of hormonally modulated cycles of frozen-thawed embryos might positively affect the outcome of such cycles. Design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: University teaching hospital. Patient(s): Patients undergoing frozen-thawed ernbryo transfer cycles. Intervention(s): Patients were randomly divided into two groups by the last digit of their identification number, Group A received our standard protocol for endometrial preparation, whereas group B patients were given an additional 250 mu g of recombinant hCG on day of P initiation, the day of embryo transfer, and 6 days later. Throughout the cycle, and to compare between the groups, serial ultrasound examinations and hormonal tests of E, and P serum levels were obtained. Main Outcome Measure(s): implantation and clinical pregnancy rates (PR). Result(s): One hundred sixty-five patients were enrolled in this study, 78 in the control group and 87 in the hCG-treated group. Progesterone levels and endometrial thickness were similar throughout the cycle in both groups. The E, level was significantly higher in group B on the day of embryo transfer and 6 days later. The PRs did not differ between the two groups (29.2% and 32.2% for groups A and B, respectively). Similarly, the implantation rates were comparable between the groups (12.7% and 14.9%, respectively). Conclusion(S): No advantage was found concerning PR and implantation rate by supplementing the secretory phase with hCG in patients undergoing transfer of frozen-thawed embryo in hormonally modulated cycles. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010;93:351-4. (C)2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available