4.7 Article

Occurrence of Mycoplasma genitalium in fertile and infertile women

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages 2376-2380

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.060

Keywords

Mycoplasma genitalium; idiopathic infertility; cervical canal; PCR

Funding

  1. Polish Committee of Scientific Studies [2 P05E 08229]
  2. Wroclaw Medical University [GR 632/2005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the frequency of occurrence of Mycoplasma genitalium in the reproductive organs of infertile women in comparison with a control group of healthy, fertile women. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Gynecology Clinic at the 2nd Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the Wroclaw Medical University, Poland. Patient(s): The study included 51 patients with primary infertility (24 women with idiopathic infertility) and 23 women with proven fertility. Intervention(s): Cervical smear and smear from the peritoneal cavity, performed during laparoscopy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Presence of the genetic material of M. genitalium in the collected material analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Result(s): M. genitalium was found in the cervical canal of 19.6% of all infertile patients and in 4.4% of fertile patients. In addition, the pathogen was discovered in the cervical canal of 29% patients with unexplained (idiopathic) infertility, which in comparison with the fertile group was a statistically significant difference. In the abdominal cavity, M. genitalium was found in 5.8% of patients from the infertile group (in 8.4% patients with idiopathic infertility), whereas it was not detected in the material obtained from the studied fertile patients. Conclusion(s): The results obtained may suggest that M. genitalium is a species having an impact on impaired fertility in women. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;91:2376-80. (C) 2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available